Dolphin Anty and Its Alternatives: An Honest Anti-Detect Browser Ranking for 2026

The information in this article is current as of late 2025. Prices and limits for anti-detect browsers change frequently, so please verify the data on official websites before making a purchase.

Introduction: Why Compare Anti-Detect Browsers in 2026

The anti-detect browser market has changed more in the past three years than in the entire previous decade. Not long ago, the choice came down to two or three products priced from a hundred dollars a month. Today, dozens of solutions compete for the same audience, and free plans have become the norm. At the same time, the algorithms of ad platforms, marketplaces, and social networks have learned to analyze not just the IP address but hundreds of device parameters: from the graphics driver version to font rendering quirks.

The Dolphin anti-detect browser, known as Dolphin Anty, quickly became one of the most talked-about tools in the Russian-speaking segment. It's praised for its convenience and free plan, criticized for controversial pricing decisions and occasional stability issues. But is it really better or worse than its competitors? We'll tackle this question without emotion, using numbers and specific scenarios.

Who needs these tools? Primarily those who legitimately work with multiple accounts simultaneously: media buying teams running dozens of ad accounts; SMM agencies serving clients across different social networks; marketplace sellers with multiple stores; developers testing services under different configurations; and scraping specialists. They all share one need: to isolate their working environments so that accounts aren't linked to each other through device fingerprints.

For readers of mobileproxy.space, there's a second important aspect. An anti-detect browser is useless without quality proxies, and mobile proxies place specific demands on a browser: support for IP rotation via a link, proper IPv6 handling, convenient bulk address addition, and status checking. That's why we gave proxy functionality its own criterion with a high weight.

In compiling this ranking, we considered features, price, proxy handling, profile limits, interface usability, and support quality. To give you a quick preview of the results: first place went to Dolphin Anty, but only by a narrow margin over Octo Browser, with AdsPower taking third thanks to its pricing advantage. Next came Multilogin, GoLogin, Undetectable, Incogniton, and Kameleo. Each is the best in its niche, and we'll explain why in detail.

Methodology for Ranking Anti-Detect Browsers

We deliberately avoided the "one service is good, the rest are bad" approach. All eight products in the main ranking solve the core task: they spoof the browser fingerprint so that modern detection systems don't find obvious anomalies. The difference between them lies in the details: how much the hundredth profile costs, how quickly support responds, whether it's convenient to add three hundred mobile proxies in a single file.

Evaluation was carried out across seven criteria with different weight coefficients:

• Features — 25%. Browser engines, fingerprint generation quality, automation, teamwork, API.
• Price — 20%. Entry cost, cost per profile at scale, availability of a free plan, pricing transparency.
• Proxy Handling — 15%. Supported protocols, bulk import, IP rotation via link, address checking, storing proxies separately from profiles.
• Limits — 10%. Restrictions on profiles, team members, cloud storage, local profiles.
• Usability — 10%. Learning curve, interface logic, Russian localization, profile launch speed.
• Support — 10%. Communication channels, response speed, documentation quality, availability of Russian-speaking specialists.
• User Reviews — 10%. The overall picture from industry forums, media buying team chats, and review platforms.

Information was gathered from several sources. First, official websites, documentation, and pricing pages. Second, test sessions on free plans and trials: we created profiles, connected rotating mobile proxies, and checked fingerprints on popular checkers. Third, public discussions in professional communities during 2024–2025. Review scores reflect the general tone of discussions, not the number of stars on a particular platform.

What we didn't factor in. We didn't evaluate the suitability of browsers for violating platform rules or laws: this ranking assumes legitimate scenarios like managing your own accounts, agencies working under contract with clients, and testing. Affiliate programs and referral bonuses weren't considered, as they don't affect product quality. Short-term promotions and discounts weren't considered either: we used base prices for monthly billing unless otherwise noted. Finally, we don't claim to measure an "account survival rate" — that metric depends on proxies, user behavior, and the platform far more than on the browser.

Criteria for Choosing an Anti-Detect Browser: What We Measured and How

Features and Fingerprint Spoofing Quality

The foundation of any anti-detect is the engine and the fingerprint database. Most products are built on Chromium, with some additionally offering a Firefox engine for scenarios where diversification matters. We checked parameter consistency: does the declared operating system match the fonts, do the WebGL parameters align with the stated graphics card, is Canvas and AudioContext emulated correctly. An inconsistent fingerprint is worse than an honest one, because it looks like an obvious forgery. We also assessed automation: API availability, support for Puppeteer, Playwright, and Selenium, built-in scenario builders, and action synchronization between windows.

Price and Scaling Costs

The starting price is misleading. For a team of five with three hundred profiles, the cost per profile and the price of an additional team member matter more. We calculated three metrics: the minimum paid tier, the cost of a hundred profiles, and the cost of a thousand profiles. The threshold for making the top list was the availability of a free plan or a full-fledged trial so you can test the product before paying.

Proxy Handling

For the mobile proxy audience, this is the key point. We checked support for HTTP, HTTPS, SOCKS5, the presence of a field for the IP rotation link, IPv6 handling, bulk list import, binding one proxy to multiple profiles, built-in address checking with country and city detection, and notifications about non-working proxies. We also looked at how the browser behaves during IP rotation: does it preserve the session, does it reset WebRTC settings.

Limits

We counted not just the number of profiles but also hidden restrictions: the number of team members, cloud storage volume, API request limits, restrictions on simultaneous profile launches, and local profiles. Some products allow unlimited local profile creation, which radically changes the economics for solo specialists.

Usability

We assessed the time from installation to the first launched profile with a proxy, grouping logic, availability of tags and statuses, bulk operations, cold profile launch speed, and RAM consumption. The threshold was Russian localization or at least a clear English interface without critical errors.

Support and Reviews

We sent a standard question about setting up rotating mobile proxies via link to all available support channels and recorded response time and quality. Reviews were analyzed for 2024–2025, filtering out obviously paid and obviously affiliated ones.

The main ranking includes eight products that scored at least 6.5 out of 10 across all criteria and have been on the market for at least three years. This threshold excluded young projects whose stability is still too early to judge.

No. 1. Dolphin Anty — The Best Balance of Features and Price for Media Buying Teams

General Information

Dolphin Anty is an anti-detect browser from the Dolphin team, which previously released Dolphin Cloud, an ad account automation service. The product launched in 2021, the developers are from the CIS, and the focus from the start was on media buying and ad networks. That's why the Dolphin anti-detect browser is often called the "media buyer's" browser: many of its features emerged from media buying team requests. The target audience is media buyers, SMM teams, agency owners working with ad accounts, and more recently, e-commerce specialists.

Key Features

• Two engines: the Anty Chromium engine and a Firefox engine, allowing you to distribute profiles across different browser families.
• Automatic generation of consistent fingerprints with manual adjustments: User-Agent, WebGL, Canvas, fonts, languages, geolocation, time zone.
• Built-in automation scenario builder: routine actions like profile warming or page list traversal can be configured without code.
• Local API for integration with Puppeteer, Playwright, and Selenium, which is convenient for developers.
• Teamwork: roles, access distribution to folders and profiles, profile transfer between members.
• Statuses, tags, notes, and color-coding of profiles — convenient when managing hundreds of accounts.
• Bulk import of proxies and cookies, proxy manager with address checking and geolocation detection.
• IP rotation link field — a key feature for rotating mobile proxies.
• Window synchronizer for parallel actions across multiple profiles.

A unique feature is deep integration with the Dolphin ecosystem: Anty profiles link to the ad automation service, saving time for teams running campaigns at scale. Technically, the browser is available for Windows, macOS, and Linux, with moderate hardware requirements: thirty open profiles run comfortably on 16 GB of RAM.

Pricing

• Free — free, 10 profiles, one user, basic functionality with no time limit.
• Base — around $89 per month for 100 profiles, team features, API, automation.
• Team — around $159 per month for 300 profiles and extended team settings.
• Enterprise — from $299 per month for 1000 profiles and priority support.

Additional profiles are purchased in packages, and annual billing gives a discount of around 20–30%. The cost per profile on the Base tier is approximately $0.89, and on Enterprise around $0.3. This is an average level for the market: more expensive than AdsPower but cheaper than Multilogin. The free plan is one of the most generous in the industry, although its limit has already been revised downward, and there's no guarantee it will remain in 2026.

Pros

• Low entry barrier. Russian-language interface, logic that's clear from the first launch, detailed documentation with examples.
• Convenient mobile proxy handling. IP rotation link, address checking, binding one proxy to a group of profiles — everything is in place and works without workarounds.
• Free plan with no expiration. Ten profiles is enough for a solo specialist starting out or for testing before buying.
• No-code automation. The scenario builder lets a marketer without a programmer set up warming and routine tasks.
• Team features on the mid-tier plan. Some competitors only offer team access on expensive plans.
• Active development. Updates are released regularly, and new Chromium versions are adopted within weeks.

Cons

• Stability after major updates. Users periodically complain about bugs in fresh releases, so teams often delay updating for a couple of days.
• Pricing policy fluctuations. The free plan limit has already changed, and some features have been moved between tiers, complicating budget planning.
• Firefox engine is less developed than Chromium. Some automation features only work with the main engine.
• Support is inconsistent. During business hours, responses are fast, but on weekends and at night, the wait can stretch for hours.
• No mobile app. You can't manage profiles from your phone, unlike GoLogin.

Who It's For

The ideal Dolphin Anty user is a media buying team of three to ten people running a hundred to five hundred ad accounts and already using mobile proxies. A typical scenario: a buyer receives a folder of profiles, each profile is assigned a rotating mobile proxy, warming is performed by a scenario, and account statuses sync with the team's spreadsheet. It also works for solo specialists on the free plan and mid-sized agencies. Large companies with thousands of profiles should compare with Octo Browser and Multilogin on scaling costs.

Best for: media buying teams and mid-sized SMM agencies working with ad accounts and mobile proxies.

Key advantage: the combination of free entry, a Russian-language ecosystem, and built-in automation tailored to advertising scenarios.

Overall score: 8.4/10

• Features: 9/10
• Price: 8/10
• Proxy handling: 9/10
• Limits: 8/10
• Usability: 9/10
• Support: 8/10
• User reviews: 8/10

No. 2. Octo Browser — The Best Fingerprint Quality and Stability for Professionals

General Information

Octo Browser has been developed since 2021 by a company registered in Estonia. The product is positioned as a premium anti-detect for professionals who don't have time for bugs. Its main specialization is fingerprint spoofing quality and stability. The audience is media buying teams, e-commerce sellers with multiple stores, crypto enthusiasts, and agencies for whom profile price matters less than predictability.

Key Features

• A single Chromium engine with fingerprint spoofing at the browser code level, not through extensions or JavaScript injections.
• A database of real device fingerprints, updated alongside Chromium releases.
• Fast profile launches: when Chrome updates, the new engine version is released within days on average.
• A full-featured API, headless mode support, integration with Puppeteer and Playwright.
• Team features: roles, tags, profile transfer, action history.
• Proxy manager with checking, IP rotation link field, support for HTTP, HTTPS, SOCKS5, and SSH.
• Cookie import in various formats, built-in robot for cookie filling.
• Localization in Russian, English, Chinese, and other languages.

A unique highlight is the speed of engine version updates. When Google releases a new Chrome, an outdated User-Agent on some anti-detects looks suspiciously outdated for weeks. Octo closes this gap faster than competitors, and professionals value exactly this.

Pricing

• Starter — around €29 per month, 10 profiles, one user.
• Base — around €79 per month, 100 profiles, teamwork, API.
• Team — around €169 per month, 350 profiles, extended roles.
• Advanced — around €329 per month, 1000 profiles, priority support.

There's no free plan, but there's a short trial period. The cost per profile on the Base tier is about €0.79, and on Advanced around €0.33. Annual billing offers a discount. The price-to-quality ratio is high for those who count downtime costs, but for a beginner, the entry is more expensive than Dolphin Anty or AdsPower.

Pros

• Fingerprint quality. On independent checkers, Octo profiles consistently show consistent parameters with no anomalies.
• Release stability. Complaints about critical bugs after updates are noticeably fewer than among competitors in the top five.
• Fast engine updates. Minimal gap between Chrome and Octo versions.
• Responsive support. Chat responses during business hours come within minutes, and specialists speak Russian.
• Flexible proxy handling. SSH tunnel support, rotation via link, bulk import with automatic checking.
• Transparent pricing. Rates change rarely, without sudden limit cuts.

Cons

• No free plan. Testing the product in real work on your own accounts is harder.
• Chromium only. You can't diversify your profile fleet with a Firefox engine.
• No no-code automation. Scenarios require a developer or third-party tools.
• Starting tier in euros. Some audiences find the currency and payment methods inconvenient.

Who It's For

Octo Browser is chosen by teams that have already passed the experimentation stage and count money through the cost of losing an account. A typical scenario: a seller on multiple marketplaces or a media buying team with proven campaigns, where one browser failure costs more than a monthly subscription. It suits mid-sized and large businesses and developers with their own automation. A beginner without a budget is better off starting with competitors' free plans.

Best for: professional teams for whom stability matters more than entry price.

Key advantage: the best fingerprint quality on the market and the fastest engine update speed.

Overall score: 8.3/10

• Features: 9/10
• Price: 7/10
• Proxy handling: 9/10
• Limits: 8/10
• Usability: 8/10
• Support: 8/10
• User reviews: 9/10

No. 3. AdsPower — The Best Price Per Profile and Powerful RPA Automation

General Information

AdsPower launched in 2020, with the company based in Asia and offices in Singapore and Hong Kong. Initially, the product was aimed at the Chinese cross-border e-commerce market, then went global and added Russian localization. Its specialization is mass multi-accounting for e-commerce, social media, and advertising, with a focus on automation. The audience is marketplace sellers, SMM teams, and media buyers with large account fleets.

Key Features

• Two engines: SunBrowser based on Chromium and FlowerBrowser based on Firefox.
• RPA builder: visual scenario editor with ready-made templates for social media and marketplaces.
• Local API, support for Puppeteer, Playwright, Selenium.
• Window synchronizer and batch operations on profiles.
• Flexible pricing: the number of profiles is chosen with a slider in increments.
• Proxy manager, address checking, IP rotation link field, bulk import.
• Extensions: installing Chrome extensions across all profiles at once.
• Team roles, action log, profile transfer.

A unique feature is the depth of RPA. The template library and logical operators allow building complex scenarios like checking store status with a messenger notification. This is a level that Dolphin Anty doesn't have, let alone Octo.

Pricing

• Free — free, 5 profiles, limited RPA feature set.
• Base — from $9 per month for 10 profiles, with the price scaling proportionally; 100 profiles cost around $50.
• Pro — from $50 per month for 100 profiles with full RPA, team, and API; 1000 profiles — around $250–300.
• Custom — individual terms for large clients.

Annual subscription gives up to 40% off. In terms of cost per profile, AdsPower is the leader of the ranking: a hundred profiles on Base is cheaper than any competitor with similar functionality. That's why it's often chosen for fleets of thousands of accounts.

Pros

• The lowest price per profile. Savings at scale become decisive with hundreds of accounts.
• Powerful no-code automation. RPA replaces separate scripts for routine tasks.
• Flexible profile count selection. No need to overpay for unused limits.
• Two browser engines. The ability to diversify fingerprints.
• Rich documentation and video tutorials. Materials in multiple languages, including Russian.
• Bulk operations. Batch editing of proxies, fingerprints, and extensions saves hours.

Cons

• Cluttered interface. A beginner gets lost in the number of settings and menus.
• Support is oriented toward Asian time zones. Russian-language responses can be slow and not always accurate.
• Questionable default fingerprint quality. With mass generation, rare parameter combinations occur that require manual correction.
• Hidden limits. Some RPA features and the number of team members are restricted on lower tiers.
• High resource consumption. The app is heavier than competitors, especially with RPA enabled.

Who It's For

AdsPower is the choice for those managing a large number of accounts who want to automate routine work without a programmer. A typical scenario: a seller with twenty marketplace stores checking statuses and reviews daily via RPA, or an SMM team warming hundreds of profiles using a template. It suits small businesses thanks to the cheap entry and large ones thanks to scale. Professionals accustomed to strict fingerprint control will need to spend time on setup.

Best for: e-commerce sellers and SMM teams with large account fleets and limited budgets.

Key advantage: the best price per profile combined with the most developed no-code RPA on the market.

Overall score: 8.0/10

• Features: 9/10
• Price: 9/10
• Proxy handling: 8/10
• Limits: 8/10
• Usability: 7/10
• Support: 7/10
• User reviews: 8/10

No. 4. Multilogin — A Market Veteran with Two Engines and Cloud Infrastructure

General Information

Multilogin is the oldest player in the ranking, with the product existing since 2015, and the company registered in the Netherlands and Estonia. For many years it was considered the gold standard, but high prices opened the door for competitors. In 2023–2024, the developer released the new-generation Multilogin X with a redesigned architecture, cloud synchronization, and reduced pricing. Its specialization is corporate multi-accounting, with an audience of agencies, companies with compliance departments, and automation developers.

Key Features

• Two proprietary engines: Mimic based on Chromium and Stealthfox based on Firefox.
• Cloud profile storage with encryption and cross-device synchronization.
• Built-in residential proxy traffic included in the plan for those without their own addresses.
• An extended API with support for Selenium, Puppeteer, Playwright, and webhooks.
• Automation via scripts and integrations with external platforms.
• Flexible fingerprint settings down to manual editing of WebGL and media device parameters.
• Team roles, audit log, two-factor authentication.
• Support for HTTP, SOCKS5, proxy checking, handling external mobile proxies.

A unique highlight is the residential proxy traffic included in the subscription. For the mobile proxy audience, this is secondary, but a beginner can start without a separate address purchase.

Pricing

• Starter — around €29 per month, 10 profiles, a small included traffic package.
• Solo — around €79 per month, 100 profiles.
• Team — around €159 per month, 300 profiles, several members.
• Scale — around €399 per month, 1000 profiles, extended API.

There's no free plan, but a short trial is available. The cost per profile on the mid-tier is about €0.79, and on the top tier around €0.4. After the update, prices became competitive but are still higher than AdsPower and Dolphin Anty at comparable limits.

Pros

• Reputation and maturity. Ten years on the market, well-established processes, predictability.
• Two full-fledged engines. The Firefox engine is as developed as Chromium, which is rare.
• Corporate security. Encryption, action auditing, two-factor authentication suit companies with compliance requirements.
• Powerful API. One of the most complete for developers building their own pipelines.
• Included proxy traffic. The ability to start without external addresses.

Cons

• Above-average price. At a thousand profiles, the difference with AdsPower is noticeable.
• Slow profile launches. Cloud synchronization adds seconds to every open.
• Transition period after the new generation launch. Some familiar features from the old version didn't appear in the new one immediately, causing dissatisfaction.
• No full Russian interface localization, and documentation is mostly in English.

Who It's For

Multilogin suits companies where auditing and security matter: agencies working with corporate clients, teams with information security departments, and developers building automation on the API who want contract stability. A typical scenario: an agency manages client accounts under contract and must prove who had access and when. Small businesses and solo specialists will find the product expensive.

Best for: mid-sized and large companies with security requirements and developed automation.

Key advantage: mature infrastructure with two equally capable engines and corporate security features.

Overall score: 7.6/10

• Features: 9/10
• Price: 6/10
• Proxy handling: 8/10
• Limits: 7/10
• Usability: 7/10
• Support: 8/10
• User reviews: 8/10

No. 5. GoLogin — Easy Entry, Web Version, and Mobile App

General Information

GoLogin was released in 2019, with the company registered in the US. The product bet on accessibility: a clear interface, a free plan, a web version that works without installation, and an Android app. Its specialization is multi-accounting for freelancers, small businesses, and SMM. The audience is solo specialists, small teams, and users who need access to profiles from different devices.

Key Features

• Orbita browser based on Chromium with automatic fingerprint generation.
• Cloud web version: profiles launch in the browser without installing a client.
• Android app for managing and launching profiles from your phone.
• A built-in package of free proxies for testing (basic quality).
• API, support for Puppeteer, Selenium, Playwright.
• Team features with access distribution to folders.
• Support for HTTP, SOCKS5, proxy checking, bulk import.
• Cookie import and export, tags and notes.

A unique highlight is multi-platform access. Launching a profile from a web interface on someone else's computer or from your phone solves tasks that competitors can't solve at all.

Pricing

• Free — free, 3 profiles.
• Professional — around $49 per month, 100 profiles, one user; with annual billing around $24 per month.
• Business — around $99 per month, 300 profiles, up to 10 members.
• Enterprise — around $199 per month, 1000 profiles, up to 20 members.

A seven-day trial unlocks paid plan features. With annual billing, GoLogin is one of the cheapest in the mid-range: a hundred profiles for $24 per month is cheaper than Dolphin Anty and Octo Browser. However, the team member limit on higher tiers restricts large structures.

Pros

• Simple interface. A beginner creates their first profile in a couple of minutes.
• Web version and mobile app. Unique access flexibility.
• Favorable annual subscription. Low price for a hundred profiles.
• Russian localization and support. Specialists respond in Russian.
• Frequent Orbita updates. The engine is kept up to date.

Cons

• Chromium only. You can't diversify engines.
• Fingerprint quality is inferior to leaders. With mass generation, atypical parameter combinations occur.
• The web version is slower than desktop and not suitable for heavy ad accounts.
• Member count restrictions. Twenty users on Enterprise isn't enough for a large agency.
• No no-code automation. Scenarios only via API.

Who It's For

GoLogin is chosen by freelancers and small teams who value simplicity and mobility. A typical scenario: an SMM specialist manages twenty client accounts, doing part of the work from a laptop and part from a phone on the go. It suits small businesses, beginner media buyers, and developers writing automation on the API. Large teams with strict fingerprint requirements should look at Octo or Multilogin.

Best for: freelancers and small teams who need access to profiles from different devices.

Key advantage: a web version and Android app at a low annual subscription price.

Overall score: 7.4/10

• Features: 7/10
• Price: 8/10
• Proxy handling: 7/10
• Limits: 8/10
• Usability: 8/10
• Support: 7/10
• User reviews: 7/10

No. 6. Undetectable — Unlimited Local Profiles and a Configuration Store

General Information

Undetectable launched in 2021, with development led by a team with an office in Cyprus. The product carved out a niche as a "local" anti-detect: profiles can be stored on your own computer without quantity limits, and cloud storage is paid separately. Its specialization is cost-effective multi-accounting for solo specialists and small teams. The audience is media buyers working alone, scrapers, and testers.

Key Features

• Chromium engine with fingerprint spoofing and a store of real device configurations.
• Unlimited local profiles on all tiers, including the free one.
• Cloud profiles for team synchronization with a per-tier limit.
• Profile import and export, simplifying migration from other anti-detects.
• API, support for Puppeteer and Selenium.
• Proxy manager with checking, IP rotation link, bulk import.
• Cookie generator and profile filling robot.
• Russian and English interface.

A unique highlight is the local profile model. A solo media buyer with three hundred accounts can work for free or with a minimal subscription if team synchronization isn't needed.

Pricing

• Free — free, 5 cloud profiles and unlimited local ones, basic configurations.
• Base — around $49 per month, 50 cloud profiles, extended configuration store.
• Professional — around $99 per month, 100 cloud profiles, team features.
• Expert — around $199 per month, 500 cloud profiles, priority support.

Annual billing gives a discount. If you count cloud profiles, the mid-tier price is comparable to Dolphin Anty. If you count local ones, Undetectable is unrivaled — but this only works for solo operators.

Pros

• Endless local profiles. The economics for solo specialists are better than any competitor's.
• Configuration store. Real device fingerprints instead of synthetic ones.
• Profile import from other anti-detects. Migration without losing cookies.
• Russian-language support and documentation.
• Moderate resource consumption. The app is lighter than AdsPower and Multilogin.

Cons

• Local profiles aren't protected from device loss. Without backup, a disk failure destroys everything.
• Team features are weaker than leaders. Fewer roles and logs than Multilogin or Octo.
• The interface is less polished. Some operations require extra clicks.
• No Firefox engine and no no-code automation.

Who It's For

Undetectable is a tool for a solo media buyer or scraper working from one computer and wanting to minimize costs. A typical scenario: a specialist runs two hundred accounts locally, uses rotating mobile proxies, and backs up to an external drive. Small businesses without a team get the most benefit. Teams with distributed access will have to pay for the cloud, and the advantage gets diluted.

Best for: solo specialists with a large number of profiles and a limited budget.

Key advantage: unlimited local profiles on any tier.

Overall score: 7.3/10

• Features: 8/10
• Price: 8/10
• Proxy handling: 8/10
• Limits: 8/10
• Usability: 6/10
• Support: 6/10
• User reviews: 7/10

No. 7. Incogniton — A Budget Option with a Generous Free Plan

General Information

Incogniton has been developed since 2019, with the company registered in the Netherlands. The product is known as a budget anti-detect with one of the most generous free plans. Its specialization is basic multi-accounting for small businesses and developers. The audience is freelancers, small e-commerce teams, and scrapers.

Key Features

• Chromium engine with automatic fingerprint generation.
• Cookie collector — a robot for filling a profile with browsing history.
• API, integration with Selenium and Puppeteer.
• Profile synchronization via the cloud.
• Team access on higher tiers.
• Mass profile creation from a spreadsheet, including proxies.
• Support for HTTP and SOCKS5, proxy checking.
• Cookie import in various formats.

A unique highlight is the free plan with ten profiles and access to most features, making the product a full-fledged tool for starting out, not a demo version.

Pricing

• Starter — free, 10 profiles.
• Entrepreneur — around $30 per month, 50 profiles.
• Professional — around $80 per month, 150 profiles, team access.
• Multinational — around $150 per month, 500 profiles, extended team.

The cost per profile on the mid-tier is about $0.53, and on the top tier $0.3. This is the second-best result after AdsPower. Annual billing offers a discount.

Pros

• Ten free profiles. Dolphin Anty's level at lower popularity.
• Low price per profile on all tiers.
• Mass profile creation from a spreadsheet saves time during import.
• A lightweight app with minimal hardware requirements.
• Stable Selenium handling for developers.

Cons

• Fingerprints are less diverse. The configuration database is inferior to leaders.
• No convenient IP rotation via link field, complicating work with rotating mobile proxies.
• Support is slow and mostly in English.
• Engine updates come with a delay relative to Chrome releases.
• No Russian localization.

Who It's For

Incogniton suits those just starting out who don't want to pay before seeing results: freelancers, small e-commerce teams, and developers testing automation. A typical scenario: a specialist runs ten accounts for free and upgrades to the $30 tier as they grow. For professional work with frequently rotating mobile proxies, Dolphin Anty or Octo Browser is more convenient.

Best for: beginner specialists and developers with a minimal budget.

Key advantage: a full-fledged free plan and a low price per profile.

Overall score: 7.1/10

• Features: 7/10
• Price: 9/10
• Proxy handling: 7/10
• Limits: 8/10
• Usability: 7/10
• Support: 6/10
• User reviews: 6/10

No. 8. Kameleo — Mobile Device Emulation for Developers

General Information

Kameleo has existed since 2017, with a developer from Hungary. The product occupies the niche of mobile browser emulation and deep automation. Its specialization is testing, scraping, and scenarios that require a mobile device fingerprint. The audience is developers, QA engineers, scraping teams, and some media buyers working with mobile traffic.

Key Features

• Several engines: Chroma based on Chromium, Junglefox based on Firefox, and emulation of Android and iOS mobile browsers.
• Emulation of touch input, screen sizes, and mobile User-Agents.
• A powerful API with official SDKs for several programming languages.
• Integration with Selenium, Puppeteer, Playwright.
• An Android app.
• Support for HTTP, SOCKS5, SSH, built-in proxy checking.
• Fingerprint generation based on real devices.

A unique highlight is mobile emulation. Combined with mobile proxies, this gives the most natural profile: a carrier IP and a smartphone fingerprint. For testing mobile versions of sites and ads, Kameleo is practically unrivaled on this list.

Pricing

• Basic — around €59 per month, a limited set of engines and no automation.
• Advanced — around €99 per month, all engines and mobile emulation.
• Automation — around €199 per month, full API and SDK.
• Enterprise — individual terms for teams.

There's no free plan, but a trial is available. The pricing model differs from competitors: limits concern features, not profile counts, and for some scenarios, this is beneficial. But the entry price is the highest in the ranking.

Pros

• Mobile emulation. The only one in the top list with full smartphone fingerprint spoofing.
• Several engines for diversification.
• The best API in the ranking and official SDKs for developers.
• No profile limit at the local level.
• A long history and a stable development team.

Cons

• High entry price. Basic is more expensive than most competitors' mid-tier.
• Weak team features. The product is designed for individual work and automation.
• The interface is outdated and not localized in Russian.
• Slow mobile engine updates compared to desktop Chromium.

Who It's For

Kameleo is chosen by developers and QA teams who need programmatic work with profiles and smartphone emulation. A typical scenario: a team tests mobile ads under different carriers via mobile proxies or scrapes mobile site versions. Marketers without a programmer and media buying teams with large staffs will find the product inconvenient and expensive.

Best for: developers and testers working with mobile traffic.

Key advantage: mobile browser emulation and the best API in the ranking.

Overall score: 6.7/10

• Features: 8/10
• Price: 5/10
• Proxy handling: 7/10
• Limits: 7/10
• Usability: 6/10
• Support: 7/10
• User reviews: 7/10

Anti-Detect Browser Comparison Table 2026

Below are the key characteristics of the eight products in a unified format. Prices are rounded and shown for monthly billing.

• Dolphin Anty: engines — Chromium and Firefox; free — 10 profiles; 100 profiles — around $89; 1000 profiles — around $299; IP rotation via link — yes; no-code automation — yes; team roles — yes; Russian interface — yes; overall score 8.4.
• Octo Browser: engine — Chromium; free — no, trial; 100 profiles — around €79; 1000 profiles — around €329; IP rotation via link — yes; no-code automation — no; team roles — yes; Russian interface — yes; overall score 8.3.
• AdsPower: engines — Chromium and Firefox; free — 5 profiles; 100 profiles — around $50; 1000 profiles — around $250–300; IP rotation via link — yes; no-code automation — yes, RPA; team roles — yes; Russian interface — yes; overall score 8.0.
• Multilogin: engines — Chromium and Firefox; free — no, trial; 100 profiles — around €79; 1000 profiles — around €399; IP rotation via link — partially; no-code automation — no; team roles — yes, with auditing; Russian interface — limited; overall score 7.6.
• GoLogin: engine — Chromium; free — 3 profiles; 100 profiles — around $49, with annual billing around $24; 1000 profiles — around $199; IP rotation via link — yes; no-code automation — no; team roles — yes, member limit; Russian interface — yes; overall score 7.4.
• Undetectable: engine — Chromium; free — 5 cloud and unlimited local; 100 cloud profiles — around $99; 500 cloud — around $199; IP rotation via link — yes; no-code automation — no; team roles — basic; Russian interface — yes; overall score 7.3.
• Incogniton: engine — Chromium; free — 10 profiles; 150 profiles — around $80; 500 profiles — around $150; IP rotation via link — inconvenient; no-code automation — no; team roles — on higher tiers; Russian interface — no; overall score 7.1.
• Kameleo: engines — Chromium, Firefox, mobile emulation; free — no, trial; tiers from €59 to €199 without profile limit; IP rotation via link — via API; no-code automation — no; team roles — minimal; Russian interface — no; overall score 6.7.

If we boil the comparison down to three indicators, the picture is this. In features, Dolphin Anty, Octo Browser, AdsPower, and Multilogin lead. In cost per profile, AdsPower, Incogniton, and GoLogin with annual billing win. In convenience of working with rotating mobile proxies, Dolphin Anty and Octo Browser performed best: in both, the IP rotation link field is placed in the proxy card, address checking shows the carrier and city, and one proxy easily binds to a group of profiles.

Alternatives That Didn't Make the Top List

Several products didn't reach the threshold scores or don't meet the maturity criterion, but deserve a mention.

• MoreLogin — a young anti-detect from Asia with two engines, cloud phones, and a free plan with two profiles. Prices are aggressive, features are growing fast, but the product is too young to assess stability, and reviews are contradictory. Worth considering if you need cloud Android devices in the same interface as browser profiles.
• Vision — an anti-detect focused on teamwork and a convenient interface, popular in the Russian-speaking segment. It didn't make the list due to narrower automation functionality and fewer independent reviews. It suits teams that value simplicity in distributing profiles among buyers.
• Ghost Browser — not an anti-detect in the full sense, but a browser with session isolation by tab without deep fingerprint spoofing. It works for simultaneously using multiple accounts of the same service on one device without device masking requirements. Cheap and simple, but insufficient for media buying tasks.

Recommendations for Choosing an Anti-Detect Browser

There's no universal winner, but by scenario, the choice becomes obvious.

• Best for beginners: Dolphin Anty. Ten free profiles, Russian interface, clear documentation, and convenient mobile proxy handling. An alternative is Incogniton if English doesn't bother you.
• Best for professionals: Octo Browser. Stability, fingerprint quality, and fast engine updates justify the absence of a free plan.
• Best value: AdsPower at scale from a hundred profiles and GoLogin with annual billing for smaller fleets. For solo specialists working locally — Undetectable.
• Best features: AdsPower thanks to RPA and two engines if you need no-code automation; Multilogin and Kameleo if automation is built by developers via API.
• Best for small business: GoLogin or Dolphin Anty on the free and first paid tier.
• Best for mid-sized business: Dolphin Anty on the Team tier or Octo Browser on Base, depending on what matters more — automation or stability.
• Best for large business: Multilogin with auditing and security requirements, AdsPower with a priority on cost at thousands of profiles.
• Best for mobile traffic and testing: Kameleo thanks to smartphone emulation paired with mobile proxies.

A separate recommendation for the mobile proxy audience. Before choosing a browser, make sure it supports three things: an IP rotation link field, proper IPv6 handling if your provider issues such addresses, and binding one proxy to multiple profiles. A mobile proxy is usually more expensive than a residential one, and it's economically justified to use it for a group of profiles with rotation between sessions. Dolphin Anty, Octo Browser, and AdsPower fully implement these scenarios; the others will require manual actions.

FAQ: Common Questions About Choosing an Anti-Detect Browser

How does the Dolphin anti-detect browser fundamentally differ from Octo Browser?

Both deliver quality fingerprints and convenient mobile proxy handling. Dolphin Anty offers a free plan, no-code automation, a Firefox engine, and integration with an ad automation service. Octo wins on release stability, Chromium update speed, and fewer bugs. If you automate a lot without a programmer — Dolphin; if you value predictability — Octo.

Is the free plan enough for real work?

Ten profiles on Dolphin Anty or Incogniton is enough for a solo specialist starting out: a few ad accounts, a couple of test accounts. For teamwork, API, and automation, a paid tier is needed. Keep in mind that free plan limits are revised, and planning long-term work on them is risky.

Do I need to buy separate proxies if the browser has built-in ones?

Built-in packages from Multilogin and GoLogin are good for testing but not for working with ad accounts and marketplaces. Mobile proxies from a specialized provider give you real carrier addresses with a high level of platform trust. The browser handles the device fingerprint, the proxy handles the network fingerprint, and a weak link in either part devalues the other.

How do I set up mobile proxy IP rotation in an anti-detect?

The provider gives you a link, and accessing it changes the IP. In Dolphin Anty, Octo Browser, and AdsPower, this link is inserted into the proxy card, and rotation is triggered by a button or schedule. We recommend changing the IP between sessions of different profiles, not within a single session, to keep behavior natural.

How many profiles can I run simultaneously?

The limitation is usually technical, not tier-based: each Chromium profile consumes 300 to 600 MB of RAM. On a computer with 16 GB, 20–30 profiles run comfortably. Undetectable and Dolphin Anty consume fewer resources, while AdsPower with RPA enabled consumes more.

What's more cost-effective at a thousand profiles?

AdsPower and GoLogin give around $0.2–0.3 per profile, Dolphin Anty around $0.3, and Octo Browser and Multilogin around €0.33–0.4. The difference at a thousand profiles reaches a hundred dollars a month, but it should be weighed against potential losses from instability.

Should I use two engines simultaneously?

Diversification makes sense for large fleets: if all your profiles are on one engine, a specific signature of that engine can link them together. Dolphin Anty, AdsPower, Multilogin, and Kameleo allow you to distribute profiles between Chromium and Firefox. For dozens of profiles, this is overkill.

Can I transfer profiles from one anti-detect to another?

There's no direct fingerprint transfer anywhere: each product generates them in its own way. Cookies and proxy settings are transferred via export and import. Undetectable and AdsPower offer import tools from popular competitors; the rest require manual work.

How important is Russian localization and support?

For teams from the CIS, it saves time: Dolphin Anty, Octo Browser, AdsPower, GoLogin, and Undetectable respond in Russian. Multilogin, Incogniton, and Kameleo are oriented toward an English-speaking audience, which complicates solving non-standard problems.

How do I check fingerprint quality before buying?

Create a profile on a free plan or trial, connect a mobile proxy, and open several independent browser fingerprint checking services. Look at consistency: do the time zone and geolocation match the proxy, does the WebGL correspond to the stated graphics card, are there any leaks through WebRTC. Inconsistency is a reason to choose a different product.

Conclusion: Anti-Detect Browser Ranking Results and 2026 Trends

The ranking showed that the anti-detect browser market has matured: all eight products solve the core task, and the choice comes down to details. Dolphin Anty took first place thanks to the combination of free entry, a Russian-language ecosystem, built-in automation, and convenient mobile proxy handling. However, the margin over Octo Browser is minimal, and for professional teams that prioritize stability over price, the second-place ranking may actually be first in practice. AdsPower remains the best choice for large account fleets and no-code automation enthusiasts. Multilogin suits corporate users, GoLogin — freelancers, Undetectable — solo specialists, Incogniton — those starting without a budget, and Kameleo — developers working with mobile traffic.

The final recommendation is simple. Start with the free plan of the Dolphin anti-detect browser or Incogniton, connect mobile proxies, check fingerprints on independent services, and assess how well the interface suits your team. If you need scale — compare the cost of a hundred and a thousand profiles on AdsPower and Octo Browser. If you need automation — decide whether it will be built without code or via API, and that will determine the choice between AdsPower, Dolphin Anty, and Multilogin with Kameleo.

The trends of 2024–2025 are obvious. First, falling prices: Multilogin cut its starting tier several times over, and free plans became the norm. Second, the growing importance of automation: RPA and no-code scenarios turned from a bonus into a mandatory feature. Third, the convergence of browsers with proxy infrastructure: IP rotation fields, carrier checking, and group address binding appeared in almost all leaders. Fourth, faster engine updates, as platforms respond more quickly to outdated versions.

What to expect next. In 2026, the role of behavioral analysis will increase: platforms will evaluate not just the fingerprint but also action patterns, so demand for warming and natural behavior scenarios will grow. Closer integrations between anti-detects and mobile proxy providers will emerge, up to automatic address selection based on profile geo. Some players will likely merge or leave the market, while leaders will focus on the corporate segment with auditing and security. For the user, this means one thing: choose a product not by loud promises but by pricing transparency, update speed, and quality of work with your proxy infrastructure. These three parameters determined the placement in our ranking.